Search for: "May v. State" Results 3161 - 3180 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 8:53 am by David Nardolillo
On May 10, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:42 am by constitutional lawblogger
Wedding ceremonies on Hawai'ian beaches may be the stuff of some fantasies, but they may also require permits from the state as any other commercial activity on state land would. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm
Providing legal representation and indemnification of State officers and employeesSamuels v Vacco, Appellate Division, 251 AD2s 10Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides that a state officer or employee is entitled to representation by the Attorney General if the individual is sued as a result of his or her performing official duties. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
In Jacobson, the Court stated that: Whatever may be thought of the expediency of this statute, it cannot be affirmed to be, beyond question, in palpable conflict with the Constitution. [read post]
” Thus, the same evidence relied upon to infer foresight prior to R v Jogee may equally be relied upon now to infer the requisite intent. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Washington, it actually applied the less demanding standard of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has ruled that class of prisoners in Connecticut may sue state officials for exposing them to radon gas, a carcinogen, and were deliberately indifferent to their safety.The case is Vega v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
Safe Harbor framework loom, there have been several recent developments that may be of interest to businesses operating in the European Union and United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
Safe Harbor framework loom, there have been several recent developments that may be of interest to businesses operating in the European Union and United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Moreover, a person faced with such a law may ignore it and exercise his First Amendment rights. [read post]