Search for: "People v Denis" Results 3161 - 3180 of 15,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am by Anita Davies
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian regimes is their insistence on controlling people’s thoughts as well as their behaviour. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:49 pm
How should the $900 million be allocated for purpose of paying people, like Ladd, with points? [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
” Based on this language the Eleventh Circuit found that certain classifications of people, include convicted felons may be denied Second Amendment rights. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:25 am
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYTrusts and Estates Motion to Dismiss Accounting Denied on Statute Of Limitations Grounds, Granted by Release Estate of Nettie Benenson Subscription Required WESTCHESTER COUNTYCriminal Practice Division of Parole Found to Have Completed Final Revocation Hearing in Timely Manner; Habeas Denied People (ex rel. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The spreadsheet did not have any information about anyone’s particular needs, and the Council accepted that disabled people were not prioritised. [read post]