Search for: "People v. Commons" Results 3161 - 3180 of 14,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 1:51 pm by Dexter J. Evans
  Said the court:It is common knowledge that people are prepared to make great sacrifices for the well-being and continued existence of their household pets, to which they have become deeply attached. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 11:45 pm
After the EU's judicial institutions were renamed, this weblog, in common with many other people and publications, has practised calling the EU's Court of Justice the Court of Justice of the European Union, abbreviating it as the CJEU. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm by David Markus
  It starts this way:History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Courtesy of Wiki Commons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join,_or_Die [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has rejected a district court false arrest judgment in favor of disabled veterans who operate vending carts on New York City sidewalks.The case is Crescenzi v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:46 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000  Read More [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 3:13 pm
The majority of people who end up developing addictions all share a common theme: Due to an injury or illness, their doctors prescribed an opioid medication, and they quickly became addicted. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:30 am by First Mondays
It turns out this situation is a lot more common than we appreciated, and we talk about why. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:32 am by Christopher Simon
In a recent Georgia Court of Appeals decision, Coral Hospitality-GA, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am
Common sense apparently is not "centrist" for the likes of Stuart Taylor and Jeffrey Rosen. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:16 am by Stephen Honig
This summer, a Delaware Chancery Court case engaged in analysis of this common question. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
It was agreed that the correct test for dishonesty was the "combined" test of Lord Hutton in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 being that: "before there can be a finding of dishonesty it must be established that the defendant's conduct was dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people and that he himself realised by those standards his conduct was dishonest. [read post]