Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2009, 11:02 pm
In Sands v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
Superior court's intervention also may be anticipated. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
Superior Court, where the Court held that “[b]ecause the plaintiff is not a California resident, California’s legitimate interests in the dispute have considerably diminished. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 3:06 pm
Superior courts in California handle both types of cases. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
Above the superior court system are state appellate courts that, as the name suggests, hear appeals from people who believe they have been wrongly convicted of a crime. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Alameda Unified School District (Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
It is hard enough to attract people of calibre and integrity to serve as superior court judges. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
In Martin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles Petition for review (PDF, 2,595 KB) Opening brief on the merits (PDF, 2,623 KB) Answer brief on the merits (PDF, 1,201 KB) Reply brief on the merits (PDF, 2,623 KB) S161385: Schacter v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
I think I found it (finally) in last month's decision by the Ninth Circuit in Moss v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
Superior Court, 157 P.3d 1017, 1022 (Cal. 2007) with U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Superior Court, 157 P.3d 1017, 1022 (Cal. 2007) (emphasis added), one would reasonably expect that the California definition was categorically broader than the definition at common law, which requires a "substantial step towards committing the crime," United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v Broderick, 392 US… [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
These opinions are alleged to be defamatory and are the subject of an action in the Superior Court of Ontario. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:22 pm
State v. [read post]
