Search for: "People v. To" Results 3161 - 3180 of 72,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 7:20 am by Walter Olson
House of Representatives Related posts “Congressman Seeks to Send Critic to Jail” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
In reversing in the interest of justices, the Court wroteas defendant correctly contends, the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses during both his opening and closing statements (see People v LaDolce, 196 AD2d 49, 57; see generally People v Bailey, 58 NY2d 272, 277-278). [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:01 am
Head tip to Mr Jeff Roberts of CIPP's "IP News This Week", your 5-minute report of the latest IP news from around the world, read here.UPDATE: Mr Thomas Chow of China Esquire wrote about and referred to a case that was decided by the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court and described by Mr Brad Luo of China Business Law Blog called 'G2000 v. 2000: Is 20 Million Yuan Enough for Trademark Infringement? [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:53 pm by Kendal Sanders
Many people who are considering filing for bankruptcy have life insurance policies and do not want to loose them by filing bankruptcy. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
Last Wednesday I blogged about a mash-up from Slate V, Hillary's Inner Tracy Flick (see here). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
As part of the DMCA, Congress enacted a cause of action for people who send bogus copyright takedown notices, codified at 17 USC 512(f). [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
While Plaintiff argues that Google’s policies create a chilling effect on speech, in the same breath, he claims that some people are proud to have their videos taken down by Google and wear it “like a badge of honor. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
Nor can coercion be inferred from President Biden’s comment that social media companies are “killing people. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]