Search for: "Perry v Perry"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 3,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
When the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
As you'll recall, that was these folks' primary argument when begging Congress to pass a law overturning the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:55 am
None of the legal arguments employed in Perry v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am
The following is a guest post by Silvia Lopez, who served as a fall 2021 remote intern transcribing and researching documents in the Herencia: Centuries of Spanish Legal Documents crowdsourcing campaign at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
V, § 15, Fla. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
They chat about duty, difficult charging decisions, and Perry Mason. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am
(A terrible idea, IMO; legislation to do this was rightly vetoed by Perry in 2009. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
" It'll be a lot of fun when Scalia hears about this. 10:40: Tom Corbun (R-OK) had this strange question "You've said that Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm
Since that decision, the US Supreme Court has only made one single ruling against any sex offender laws; the Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:11 am
And unfortunately for the defense, a similar circumstance was allowed by the Florida Supreme Court as recently as this year in McWatters v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:34 pm
Is the First Amendment, as John Perry Barlow famously said, only a local ordinance in Cyberspace? [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
I did not expect zip out of the Supreme Court or Governor Perry. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:04 am
The Courtmodified this rule five years later in Tison v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, Section 1210.06(b), Fourth Edition (April 2005); citing In re Perry Mfg. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
In the leading case of R v Mohan, the Supreme Court held that expert evidence should only be admitted where it is broadly “relevant” and “necessary” to assist the trier of fact. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
