Search for: "Petition of Thomas"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
And if you have a case in which this is teed up, and don’t want to do the certiorari petition, just e-mail me — I might well be able to step in myself. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
The opinion notes that Chief Justice and Justice Alito would not have granted certiorari, and Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm
” The Chief Justice, Justice Stevens, Justice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Clinic student Jacqueline de Armas ('11) assisted last summer with the cert petition. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Reed, a case about signatures on a referendum petition in the State of Washington. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:43 pm
They requested a contested case to adjudicate their petition. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
Reed, in which the Court held that petition signatories generally do not have a right to remain anonymous. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Justice Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court, which Justice Scalia joined in full and which Justices Stevens, Breyer, and Sotomayor joined in large part. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am
It also chose one new petition to be argued this fall. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:26 pm
. --, No. 09-559, 2010 WL 2518466 (June 24, 2010): Many interesting things to say about this case upholding the facial validity of disclosure of the names/addresses of people who sign petitions that are placed on the ballot, but I was struck most initially by a bit in the dissent by Justice Thomas: A referendum supported by only one person’s signature is a nullity; it will never be placed on the ballot. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
Justice Thomas dissented. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:06 pm
., June 24, 2010), are objections to the release of the names of signers of a petition seeking a referendum to overturn Washington’s expansion of the rights of domestic partners. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
Patterson, in which the Court held that when a defendant succeeds in having his original sentence overturned, a subsequent habeas petition challenging the new sentence is not a prohibited “second or successive” petition even if it raises grounds that could have been raised to challenge the original sentence. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:10 am
., June 24, 2010), are objections to the release of the names of signers of a petition seeking a referendum to overturn Washington's expansion of the rights of domestic partners. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
Justices Thomas and Alito are obviously sympathetic to that claim. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the Opinion for the Court; only Thomas dissented, although there are... [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:41 am
Writing for himself and Justices Stevens, Scalia, Breyer, and Sotomayor, Justice Thomas explained that under the text of the federal habeas statute, when a prisoner is resentenced and appeals the new sentence, he is challenging a different judgment than was challenged in his prior habeas petition. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:15 am
Writing for himself and Justices Stevens, Scalia, Breyer, and Sotomayor, Justice Thomas explained that under the text of the federal habeas statute, when a prisoner is resentenced and appeals the new sentence, he is challenging a different judgment than was challenged in his prior habeas petition. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
The vote is 8-1, with a dissent by Justice Thomas. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:33 am
When a state prisoner gets federal habeas relief on punishment but not guilt and is then resentenced, does the successive petition rule bar any claims in a new habeas petition that could have been raised in the first one? [read post]
