Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 3,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The Supreme Court held 5 to 4 today in Altria Group, Inc, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:54 pm
In Adams v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
But there is a persuasive Ninth Circuit case, Gardner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:45 am
United States (DC Cir., 1923) 293 F. 1013. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:58 pm
The new case is Gross v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Weatherford Bancshares, Inc., 187 S.W.3d at 701; Pabich v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., No. 07-1239 (Nov. 12, 2008):Ruling preserves Navy strength in defenseThe United States has done more than any other country to protect whales, porpoises, seals and other marine mammals. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
Chesterton Co., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc., explained the rationale for what it called "strict liability":We need not recanvass the reasons for imposing strict liability on the manufacturer. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
Powers. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
See Albertsons, Inc., v. [read post]
