Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 3161 - 3180 of 5,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 5:53 am
In the Bábí and Bahá'í faiths, a group of 19 is called a Váhid, a Unity (Arabic: ???? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  In the case of Glik v Cunniffe (26 August 2011) the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The Citizen Media Law Project and the Thomas Jefferson Center have posts about the case. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
Friday, February 3 Panel I: Judicial Decisionmaking (Mentor: Lee Epstein) Margaret Thomas, The Federalism Canons of Statutory Interpretation as a Constraint on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Nancy Leong, Making Remedies Elizabeth McCuskey, Clarity and Clarification: Grable Federal Questions in the Eyes of Their Beholders Paul Gugliuzza, Patent Law's Uniformity Principle and the Consequences of Judicial Specialization  Panel II: Judicial Capacity and Executive Action (Mentor:… [read post]
This question becomes more pressing as the clock ticks toward April 1, when the five-year term of Comptroller Thomas J. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:06 pm by Eva Arevuo
Andrew Cohen, writing for The Atlantic, tells us what he’s thinking about: After Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2016, the Court received an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am by Moria Miller
Lopez, which limited the power of Congress to reach inside intrastate activity, he said. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:12 pm
  Because of numerous Supreme Court decisions, including the 6-3 decision in 2005, in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas is next with the opinion in Utah v. [read post]