Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 6,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
The opinion includes a lengthy analysis of the state action doctrine as applied to the prison's food service contractor.In Seamons v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:46 am
This interpretation is consistent with the Michigan State Court Administrative Office’s (SCAO) July 27, 2009 publication, “Interest rates for money judgments under MCL 600.6013,” in which it stated that under MCL § 600.6013(8), “[i]nterest is calculated at 6-month intervals on Jan 1st and July 1st of each year, starting from the date the complaint is filed . . . . [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
In Sue Carter v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 2:35 pm
Friday, I argued that there's mo First Amendment problem with compulsory union agency fees in Janus v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:47 am
The United States’ Supreme Court case known as NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:47 am
The United States’ Supreme Court case known as NLRB v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Libertarian Party of Michigan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 8:42 am
From Sackler v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:53 pm
United States, 387 U.S. 425, 87 S. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:59 pm
On Sloan’s heels, the Northern District of Ohio addressed the same issues in Watkins v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:49 pm
But the Supreme Court stated as early as United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
Hot off the press and only available at TalkLeft: Peniel Cronin's revised Caucus v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
The Consolidated Cases The Court’s opinion is the product of three consolidated cases alleging workplace discrimination: Bostock v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General to offer the government's views on three cases -- 06-923, Metlife v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
In summing up the case, the Appeals Court offered two observations: (1) "NCPs are meant to be a temporary bridge to compliance for manufacturers that have 'made every effort to comply.' United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:19 am
On June 8, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 12:04 pm
The case is Perry v. [read post]
