Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 5,994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
Rosenblatt’s decisions to apply for dozens of Internet domain names with the name De Beers, obtain a Web site proposal and seek investment dollars “were done in entirely bad faith,” she said. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
California, through its Sherman Law, expressly adopted federal labeling requirements as its own. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:19 am
If it seems like we’ve been here before, it’s because we have. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:42 am
Although the Lanham Act doesn’t provide for nationwide jurisdiction, the Sherman Act does. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:21 pm
A violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine for individuals. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
As the 11th Circuit’s opinion adopts the findings and conclusions of the District Court, a “quick look” at the District Court’s opinion may be helpful. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
As the 11th Circuit’s opinion adopts the findings and conclusions of the District Court, a “quick look” at the District Court’s opinion may be helpful. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm
The statute – California’s Sherman Law – is identical to the FDCA. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
Reportedly, Tedy did not have a field pass and was denied access by a security guard identified as Arthur Sherman. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Craig Sherman, partner focusing on corporate and securities law at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, and first appeared in the firm’s Entrepreneurs Report. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:24 am
” Chartier contends that the Guard’s behavior and the events involving the interaction are because the other defendants were institutionally negligent and did not properly train or supervise Sherman. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
A copy of the First Circuit’s opinion can be found here. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
In other words, plaintiffs were not seeking to enforce the FDCA, which prohibits private causes of action, but rather California’s Sherman Law. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
The court dismissed the Sherman Act claims with leave to amend. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Sherman Act Section 1 Claim Plaintiff also brought a Sherman Act Section 1 claim asserting that Car Sound’s provision of free shipping to Allied for the Pacific Northwest, along with other advantages, while refusing to provide Gorlick with those benefits, constituted an illegal vertical restraint in violation of the rule of reason. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am
The court dismissed the Sherman Act claims with leave to amend. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
The court of appeals also affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s Sherman Act section 1 claim, which reframed essentially the same facts as a conspiracy. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm
Getting more towards field preemption, the judge wrote that even if the Sherman Law’s requirements were parallel to those of FMIA/PIPA, “allowing a jury to weigh in on preapproved USDA labels would surely conflict with the federal regulatory scheme. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Take, for example, the Sherman Act, which makes illegal agreements in restraint of trade.4 How should a court proceed if a defendant claims that the agreement he made with his codefendant is speech protected by the First Amendment even if it’s in restraint of trade? [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am
Kulmatycki, supra(quoting Sherman & Co v. [read post]
