Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 12,944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 3:41 pm
The panel noted that insurance regulation was a field traditionally occupied by the states, and the panel presumed that the Medicare secondary payer provisions did not preempt state insurance laws unless Congress clearly manifested its intent to do so. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
Military Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Xenia Chiaramonte, Social Movements and the Legal Field: Becoming-Constituent Andreas Witte, The International Regulation and Governance of Time [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:22 am
The principal elements of the current legal regime, as applied in practice by the ISA, are as follows: Following the 1999 landmark decision by the Israeli Supreme Court in PCATI v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Section 5, Article 27(1) of TRIPS states, “patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[iii] United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
Clayton County, and between Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito and advocate David Cole in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:50 pm
In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Roberts’s outstanding work drew the attention of White House counsel Fred Fielding, who recruited Roberts to his staff in 1982. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:34 pm
” State-law claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
[5] Fiers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]