Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 122,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 6:50 pm
The following introduction, from the top of page 3 of this opinion, sounds a little more like something you'd see in a work of fiction (or perhaps by Justice Kavanaugh) than in the statement of facts of a Court of Appeal opinion:"Lions was about to enjoy an afternoon beer outside . . . . [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:47 am
See Wis. [read post]
31 May 2013, 10:13 am
Sufficiently so that taking it en banc seems right.We'll see what the en banc panel looks like. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 8:42 pm
This is why you like to see incredibly smart people -- sometimes academics, even -- appointed to the Court of Appeals.It's an erudite, comprehensive, and incredibly good opinion. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:27 pm
The Ninth Circuit just took the case en banc.We'll see what the draw looks like. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:56 pm
See what you think. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
Read this opinion -- or at least the first dozen pages or so -- and see whether you think the defendant:(A) Wouldn't have done the same thing but for his initial religious upbrining;(B) Wouldn't have done the same thing if he wouldn't have abandoned that upbringing;(C) A mix of both (A) and (B). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
Even if it's not signed by two witnesses (as required by the Probate Code), if you dictate a will to someone, they write it down, you sign it, and several people see you do all this, that's enough for a valid will. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:59 am
Ever see a published opinion in which the opinion itself is less than 5 pages but the caption is almost three times as large? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
See the complaint here. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:08 pm
You see a lot of different crimes reported in the various appellate decisions. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:37 pm
You don't see many felony convictions for perjury. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 11:14 am
You don't see many appellate cases that actually award fees for a party's refusal to admit RFAs. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
But doing so nicely.It's good to see judges remembering that appeals involve real people with real problems. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
See generally on individual immunities, my treatise CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES LITIGATION: THE LAW OF SECTION [...] [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
UPDATE: Unfortunately for those that might have found interesting a lawsuit regarding corporate cyber-attacks (see the original post, below), BidClerk and Reed Elsevier apparently resolved their differences fairly quickly and quietly. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:13 pm
But Justice Simons authors a lengthy concurrence in which he argues that California's precedent on this issue -- involving what it takes for hearsay to be admitted as a declaration against penal interest -- is unfounded and should be changed.That's the kind of out-of-the-box thinking I like to see. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:21 am
[See coverage of another case from the November 22nd hand down list.] [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Want to see how to write a persuasive -- and important -- opinion in five double-spaced pages? [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Let me see if I get this right.Brother A shoots Brother B in the home of Mother. [read post]
