Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:01 pm
Take a look, for instance, at the series of goofs in Tennessee in Cone v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:21 am
" Kistner Concrete Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:21 am
In sharp contrast, this essay argues that the principle of shareholder wealth maximization is both a valid positive account of corporate law and also a legitimate normative proposition. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
., v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
The only case in which this exception has really been tested involved Boeing intentionally exposing its workers to poisons (I believe it was poisons, may have been radiation…its been a while since I’ve looked over the case, Birklid v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:55 pm
(See, e.g., Hall v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
In the Courts On 24 January 2011 permission to appeal was granted in the case of Gaunt v OFCOM. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:10 am
Mushkin and Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm
(1709 Blog) Spain Law to shutdown P2P sites resurrected by Spanish coalition (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom When it’s too late to mend a broken patent – EWCA decision in Nokia GmbH v IPCOM GmbH & Co KG (PatLit) ‘Companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours’ – Apple sues Nokia in High Court (IPBiz) Infamous antipiracy lawyer, Andrew Crossley gives up, abandons P2P cases (ArsTechnica) (1709 Blog) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(Follow the links for Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.) [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
Simply put, these were narrow federal habeas opinions with sharp language aimed at the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 4:03 pm
” Likelihood of Success The Judge undertook the balancing exercise/parallel analysis in accordance with Re S, McKennitt v Ash, Lord Browne v Associated etc. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm
Having long neglected even to closely monitor the sharp practices of health insurers, federal regulators are now beginning new programs of surveillance.** Insurance Reporting and Classification Reporting requirements may not seem like a notable accomplishment. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:57 am
Sharp v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:51 am
When ordering an injunction to restrain a misuse of private information in DFT v TFD, discussed here, Sharp J also ordered that there should be no report of the existence of the proceedings themselves, i.e. she made a super-injunction. [read post]
