Search for: "State v. Cooper" Results 3161 - 3180 of 7,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
Cooper, holding that the Constitution did not give Congress the power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement in a 1990 law, “reveals that the Court’s sovereign immunity doctrine is a mess of its own making. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
, and that Ginsberg had settled his claims against Gittleman and HP and would no longer cooperate with Kates Nussman or permit Kates Nussman to review or rely on the evidence and experts that Ginsberg had paid for. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:58 pm
The courts, so far, have been far too willing to cooperate. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
The federal ban that the Supreme Court upheld in Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeProbationer's Diminished Privacy Expectation, Reasonable Suspicion Justified Search Revealing Gun United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
District Court, Southern DistrictLegal Profession Firm May Not Represent Alleged Tax Fraud Conspirator and Cooperating Government Witness US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDefendant Refusing to Cooperate With Counsel Competent; 'Precautionary' Exam, Testimony Noted United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
City of New York Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance Insurer Obligated to Defend Owner in Personal Injury Action and Reimburse Costs of Defense Cooper Square Associates LP v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Cooper (10-1024) — scope of damages for violation of federal Privacy Act (Justice Kagan recused) Mon., Dec. 5: Caraco Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:50 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCivil RightsFree With Registration: Panel Revives Retaliation Claims by Workers Who Cooperated in Probe of Supervisor Hicks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
This presumption reflects the requirements of international law, whereby one State should not infringe upon the sovereignty of another, and the rule of comity, which is founded on mutual respect between States. 2. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]