Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 7:50 am
My analysis of Monday's argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:50 am
A divided Supreme Court on Monday turned down an attempt from two states to deny efforts to fund Planned Parenthood. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
The decision in Tsavaris v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
This is Part IV in a series discussing the recent holding in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
The State allows officers to demand a driver give blood if they refused to take a breathalyzer test. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The court in this case also used the analysis in Silver v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The court in this case also used the analysis in Silver v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:04 am
Comm. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:38 am
99.8 % e.e.It all came down to the interpretation of the claims. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
The Superior Court's decision in Marlette v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 1:11 pm
State and Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 2:05 pm
It faithfully applied the (not-really-originalist) rules that the Supreme Court laid down last June in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
US (Guest Blog Post) * Indianapolis Police Have Been “Blinded Lately Because They Shut Backpage Down” * Constitutional Challenge Against FOSTA Filed–Woodhull v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Lord Sumption pointed out that it was not expressly stated in the ADA that the authority to collect payments was irrevocable, nor was it stated that such an authority should survive termination. [read post]
