Search for: "State v. London" Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
”[2]For Marxist-Leninist and many post-colonial states, it is described as “Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Global Human Rights Governance. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
His essays have appeared in The New York Times, The New Yorker and The London Review of Books. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]