Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2018, 3:52 am
Schlafly v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
CFA Institute v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
That latter section does not expressly state that the opposition period cannot be extended after the fact. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
Intellogy Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:12 am
Marathon Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:21 pm
Related Cases: Shubert v ObamaJewel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
No. 3122052) filed on February 24, 2005 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and stated to have been first used in commerce at least as early as February 4, 2004 (the "FACEBOOK Marks"), and a European Community Trademark for FACEBOOK (Reg. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
Ed. 2d 497 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:03 pm
See Mason v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Kubiak v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
Dfinity Found. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:28 am
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
State-based registrations offer some of the protections of federal registration, and are a useful tool to stake one’s claim in a trademark within the states that the mark is used, and provide notice to competitors of that claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
