Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
F.T.C. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:12 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:02 pm
So on the one hand I, as the consumer, was driven by functionality. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
We’ve got to understand why manufacturing in a lot of cases doesn’t seem to be profitable anymore. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
(April 27, 2010) and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 8:07 pm
Supreme Court in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:22 pm
P. 9(b) because the California consumer protection statutes “do not sound in fraud. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am
I wouldn't let him into my house if I wanted to keep my possessions or my sanity. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 6:35 pm
Don’t make us pay the price of protecting competitors. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:42 pm
We are opposed to allowing children to consume it, although we don't see the government getting involved in that either. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
Since June 2011 almost a million and a half people have sought bankruptcy protection. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
“In support of its decision, the court invoked a 1995 Supreme Court case, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Even if it doesn’t end up going anywhere, just this particular court packing scheme is bad enough to shoot down. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
It demonstrates the CRTC’s desire to ensure healthy competition in the Canadian communications industry and to protect the interests of consumers. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:32 pm
I'm just not at all sure there's a valid First Amendment principle that says that hundreds of thousands of trees have to die just so a consumer can be compelled to pick up 1,344 pages of trash in his driveway (i.e. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
In Lavan v. [read post]
