Search for: "True the Vote"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 11,923
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Many observers have reasonably assumed that the Court's decisions turn on the votes of one or more of the Chief Justice and Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
If that is so, that would ordinarily mean that the same should be true at the state level. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:22 am
Google’s incentives to reduce the costs of complements so as to harvest more eyeballs to view advertising are immense….This point is indeed true, and so is an additional point. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
One of the co-defendant lawyers made an extended, overtly religious argument during the penalty phase to the jury, strongly implying that the jurors’ souls would be jeopardized if they voted for death: Surely, one among you believes in God, the father, the son [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
He has voted against affirmative action in higher education, racial balance in public schools, and the crucial “preclearance” provision of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
The name is too good to be true. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
That is not true. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
Schiff "fraudulently fabricated" a statement of the President and "read it to Congress as if it was [his]"—a ridiculous charge (see below), but let that pass for the moment and assume it is true—it is not a crime (or even a "Crime"), and he cannot be arrested for it. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:18 pm
via thebulwark.com Is this true? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 7:56 am
She was raised in a big family, so she’s used to putting things to a vote. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
” In a per curiam decision, three justices voted to affirm the order granting the MAR and three justices voted to reverse it. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Sims establishing the one-person-one-vote principle—is an excellent example. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:17 pm
But would that be true for a convicted President? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
Like the settlement structure, the voting rules are made known to class members before they decide whether to stay in or opt out of the procedure. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
True, the Constitution does not require a House vote. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Robbins, and barely held onto Chief Justice Roberts’ fifth vote, by cataloging a long list of limitations on Auer (and, presumably, Chevron deference). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm
It was a true bombshell. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
This is particularly true, he argues, because most of the justices didn’t even agree with Powell’s rationale. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
I am not saying that Biden has a non-liberal voting record, but I am saying that he has shown no appetite at all for playing hardball. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Instead of a true random draw, some person (e.g., a court administrator) or persons (e.g., a committee of experts) or thing (e.g., a computer via an algorithm)[15] places all the active judges, with the exception of the chief judge, into two equal groups. [read post]
