Search for: "U.S. v. Card*" Results 3161 - 3180 of 4,782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As a result, the relator’s burden to prove the tax obligation required proof that the taxpayer had a tax collection and remittance obligation (or nexus) under Illinois tax law that would not offend U.S. commerce clause nexus principles.9 While proving attributional nexus is an arduous factual task, the additional requirement to prove that the taxpayer acted with a “knowing” mental intent significantly increases the relator’s difficulty in proving a FCA violation. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm by admin
In Canada, as many know, we’ve had competition law since 1889 (one year as Canadians like to boast before the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
  These Communist Party elements were the chief stumbling blocks to economic reforms within Cuba and they will do what they can to block any change from the status quo in Cuban-U.S- relations. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:08 am
Pubpat had a press release on March 29, 2005:The issue stems from a case that involves a patent granted by the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
The statute did not state that the threat of class action must be set forth, according to the court.Dismissal of the CLRA claims was affirmed in two of the actions on appeal in which the proposed class of ticket purchasers was so broadly defined that material misrepresentations to the whole class could not be shown.The August 22 opinion in Stearns v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:44 am by Matt Sundquist
Following up on yesterday's New York Times editorial on access to federal courts, and in particular the Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by HR Hero Alerts
After a lengthy analysis, the court held that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:52 am by John Tucker
Called the DirectExpress card, it is issued by Comerica Bank as the financial agent ofthe U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:55 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Monge et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:17 pm
The group recently objected to Santa Clara University’s decision to honor former Clinton administration official and U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Circuit for finding such a judicial disclosure to be reversible error, even though the defense did not object when it was disclosed. blank">U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Bridget Johnson on anti-cinema, anti-stock-trading views of radical Islamist British activist and former lawyer Anjem Choudary] Rare coalition of bankers, housing advocates urges limits on mortgage-related suits [W$J] “The Administrative State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court recognized tribes’ rights to operate casinos on their reservations in 1987, in California v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm by Lawrence Solum
Thus, Puerto Rico’s long-enjoyed Eleventh Amendment immunity is liable to evaporate if the U.S. [read post]