Search for: "USA v. Doe" Results 3161 - 3180 of 4,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
In a libel case, the claimant does not have to prove that the publication caused (or even was likely to cause) damage. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
The net effect was that YouTube benefited from the USA's safe harbor provisions. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
The judge commented that “the claimant’s evidence of actual confusion is not of sufficient weight to lend any significant positive support to the claimant’s case but it does play an important negative role in this action. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:52 am by Gabriele Girardello
 The kitten looking for the return of trade secrets is CC0 Public Domain from https://pxhere.com/en/photo/628503The first picture is "Cat in a box", by Greg Mote from Glendora, CA, USA - CC 2.0    [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
Stevens.But the First Amendment protects against the Government; it does not leave us at the mercy of noblesse oblige. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am by Timothy Edgar
 Extending the Privacy Act to foreign citizens does next to nothing. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Philip Morris USA, Inc., No. 3:09-cv-141567 (M.D. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Florian Mueller
There's an unwilling licensor here, Nokia, and figuratively speaking, Conti is chasing that one across the USA. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:47 pm by Ilya Somin
. - we have both written for CNN, USA Today, and the Wall Street Journal). [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
This blog has almost (but not quite) ceased its coverage of things that are wrong with the Episcopal Church (USA), or ECUSA, as I choose to dub it. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
   This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases took 28 years to… [read post]