Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 3161 - 3180 of 6,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2014, 1:05 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They also expressed concerns that Texas already had the broadest pre-suit discovery mechanisms in the entire country, and referred to the United States Supreme Court’s comment in Chick Kam Choo v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm by INFORRM
Another First Amendment issues affecting school students across the United States concerns bracelets stating “I ? [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:40 pm by Scott Birkey and R. Clark Morrison
In a far-reaching decision with sweeping implications, a federal district judge in Montana eliminated the Army Corps’ nationwide permit for utility line crossings over waters of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:49 am
Instead, the task of filling this vacuum fell entirely to the Supreme Court, which began that effort with the most famous footnote in the law - Footnote Four of United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/281418.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:38 pm
Smokes-Spirits.com, Inc., No. 92 The Court of Appeals answered the following certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the negative: 1) Does New York City have standing to assert its claims under General Business Law section 349? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:27 pm by Keith Rizzardi
On March 24, 2000, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated Canada lynx as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. ? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 4:57 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 When counsel stated that the leak problem had begun in 2007, Justice Thomas asked why the defendant hadn't sued then. [read post]