Search for: "WILLIAMS v. DEFENSE " Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In his post-submission brief, Petitioner argues that these statements were "within his First Amendment rights as recognized in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, “asserted on Sunday that Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
(Publication of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association), April 2003 issue. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Williams , No. 05-4416, 05-6778 Sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine is vacated and remanded where the district judge committed procedural error by relying improperly on the plea policy of a county district attorney, whereas the judge should have resorted to the Sentencing Guidelines as the starting point for determining an appropriate sentence. [read post]