Search for: "Wall v. State" Results 3161 - 3180 of 6,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm by Amy Howe
Wall for petitioner (Art Lien) Arguing for Apple, lawyer Daniel Wall told the justices that the iPhone users’ claim is exactly the kind of claim that is prohibited under the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
But the Court instead gutted the Equal Protection clause in the 19th Century in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 11:13 pm by Phoebe Appel | Penn State Law, US
In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, Musk and Ramaswamy said that DOGE’s “North Star for reform” will be the Constitution and that they plan to work with legal experts and government agencies and focus on two recent Supreme Court rulings: Loper Bright v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:15 pm by Walter Olson
Levine (20) Westport’s wall woes (1) Want to open a store? [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Tanvir Infographic (Mariam Morshedi, Subscript Law) Carney v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:10 am
The Appellate Division, First Department, doesn't think so.In Litwack v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
In today's Wall Street Journal, John J. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:45 pm by Howard Bashman
” In commentary, today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal contains an editorial titled “The Court vs. the Regulatory State: The Justices can restore their power to check bureaucratic excess. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 11:46 am by Hina Shamsi
Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act (which is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act) and deployed federal troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court’s Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  There, the House has sued several officials to enjoin them from expending funds to build the Trump “border wall,” arguing that because Congress has only appropriated a small amount of money to build the wall, the officers have violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, Art. [read post]