Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
To unite the country. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Regan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:05 am
Subsequent to Fields, the United States Supreme Court clarified that the distinction was not time dependent; that is it did not flip back and forth dependent on when the accident occurred. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:26 am
” Kitzes v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
United States, 917 F. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. 1st District.Insurance -- Homeowners -- Appraisal -- Trial court did not err in determining that policy's appraisal provision clearly and unambiguously applied to claim by insured's assignee for water mitigation services -- Policy provided that either party could demand appraisal to resolve “disagreement regarding the amount of the covered loss,” and it was undisputed that water mitigation services… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm
When the United States Supreme Court issued Brown v Board of Education, southern states engaged in Massive Resistance against it. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:29 pm
(NA) Earlier today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
"While we do not think that the trial court was equating itself with the United States Supreme Court," Yegan wrote, "the effect of its ruling can only be equated with overruling Marchman. [read post]
