Search for: "York v. Texas"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 3,947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
E.g., Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 6:35 am
Stracher does note the Supreme Court precedent, Estes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
We issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 47.4 because the law to be applied in the case is well settled. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:37 am
Texas. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
“From the beginning of his time as a Justice, you could see Stevens’s roots in the New Deal Court and his willingness to justify an expanding welfare state,” Richard Epstein, a libertarian-leaning law professor at New York University, said. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Boggs (Corpus Christi, Texas)Atlantic v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm
(FTC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:41 am
Texas). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:50 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:36 pm
It is correctly pronounced HOW STUN not U STONE like they do it in Texas. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:11 am
The shrillness of these executed-but-innocent claims is matched only by their mendacity, as Justice Scalia demonstated in his devastating concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:37 pm
The case is Boles v. [read post]
