Search for: "A D v. State of Indiana" Results 301 - 320 of 1,416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Indiana to the idea that portions of the Bill of Rights would not be incorporated against the states (“Really? [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The case has since been transferred to the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. d/b/a Maxi-Cosi of Columbus, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 6,467,840 (“the ‘840 Patent”) for a “Child’s Car Seat Insert”. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Inspire”) of Boulder County, Colorado, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, enVista, LLC, enVista Interactive Solutions, LLC d/b/a Enspire Commerce, and RetailPoint II, LLC d/b/a RetailPoint, all of  Carmel, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration Number 4,344,942. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Smart Solar Inc. d/b/a Smart Living Home & Garden of Libertyville, Illinois, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Sky Billiards, Inc. d/b/a Best Choice Products of Irvine, California, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 7,484,671 (“the ‘671 Patent”) for “Water Feature”. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
While there are differences from state to state, the approach taken by most states with respect to the practice of dentistry is fairly consistent. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Biestek v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court considered whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the justices considered whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states, that “[t]he unusual left-right coalition of organisations urging the Supreme Court to side with Mr Timbs—Christian conservatives, libertarians, anti-poverty activists, the Chamber of Commerce—seems to have the support of an ideologically diverse array of justices. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the justices considered whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which they will consider whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, noting that “Timbs’ appeal to the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, a challenge to the state’s “attempt[] to take … beach property without just compensation by abusing the common-law doctrine of ‘public trust. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states. [read post]