Search for: "A. E. v. State of Alabama "
Results 301 - 320
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Georgia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:04 am
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Using accordions as a law firm marketing technique - Legal marketing expert Larry Bodine in his Law Marketing Blog ERISA attorney blogger comments on Tullis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
P. 32.1(e)(3)). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
[12/5/2017 UPDATE: See subsequent blog post on--> Judge Kelly's TRO ruling from the bench in English v Trump et Mulvaney with hotlink to full transcript.]TEXT OF STATE OF TEXAS AMICUS MOTION Motion of the States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas,Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and South Carolina To File Brief asAmici Curiae in Support of Defendants:The States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia,Louisiana,… [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
State Medicaid Coverage Issues of CPT Code 99050 and CPT Code 99051: If a participating provider treats a Medicaid recipient after normal business hours, a number of State Medicaid plans now permit a participating provider to bill an appropriate Evaluation and Management (E/M) code AND bill CPT 99050 or CPT 99051 as an additional charge to reflect the fact that after-hours care was provided. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
You can reach her by e-mail at ctorress at law.stetson.edu. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
See Williams v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
More significantly, the Court in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders explicitly rejected the notion of shareholder primacy, stating, [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” Rick Hasen also discusses the Alabama redistricting cases at Slate, emphasizing that, although “[n]o one disputes that the Alabama legislature packed black voters into a few legislative districts, thus strengthening Republican control in the majority of districts throughout the rest of the state,” “whether or not that action is constitutional depends a great deal on whether the court views this as a case about race (in which case… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Support for Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 271(e)(2)(C)(ii). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Thomas E. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Ash v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
