Search for: "ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE V US"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 6:32 pm
Musta v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:13 pm
Musta v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 6:25 am
The opinion is styled, Allied North America Insurance Brokerage of Texas, L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
Chevrolet_Lumina_Minivan.jpg In highlighting use of FRE 803(17), in a carjacking prosecution, the Third Circuit finds no error in testimony by an agent that he used the vehicle's identification number (VIN) number to trace it on a database compiled by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) to its manufacture in a foreign state, helping to establish the interstate commerce element of the offense; noting that the NICB database was the "only… [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:46 am
When a person is injured at work in Pennsylvania, and the injury is not accepted by the workers’ compensation insurance carrier, the injured worker must file a Claim Petition to seek benefits. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:40 pm
It did not accept that a presumption of coverage exists. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
The language used is not found in traditional policy forms drafted by the Insurance Services Office, Inc. or its predecessors (“ISO”), the London Market, or other insurance markets and used prior to the advent of the Bermuda Form; and was designed to address the specific concern discussed above. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:37 pm
Milligan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm
Blanchard v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:11 am
In its 2010 opinion in Insurance Institute of Michigan, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
I analyzed the federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:16 am
The insured's retention of legal counsel does not cause the insured to lose their "claimant" status under the statute. -- In discussing this point, a 1999, Tyler Court of Appeals, in Dunn v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:58 am
Allmerica Financial Corporation et al v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Using the language of Dyson LJ in AMEC Capital Projects Ltd v Whitefriars City Estates Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1535, “something more is required”, which must be “something of substance”. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
This type of critical analysis is normal for those of us in insurance coverage litigation. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
The owner of the mark could only adduce evidence of a handful of insurance claims and some correspondence as proof of use. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:49 pm
The exception encourages the insurer to make an overpayment pending a subsequent CPP disability pension that may be used to reimburse the insurer for the overpayment. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
The insurer then submitted that in Gill v. [read post]
