Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
Civil proceedings have, since 1995, advocated this exclusively  objective test (Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 164, confirmed by Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37). [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Misuse of Private Information (Article 10) – That it is doubtful whether there can any Article 10 rights in relation to information concerning the claimant’s sexual behaviour, disclosure of which would contribute nothing to any debate of general interest  in a democratic society: Von Hannover v Germany [2004] EMLR 21 (European Court of Human Rights), confirmed in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 1081. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175, the court explained that  "mandamus does not lie to enforce the performance of a duty that is discretionary, as opposed to ministerial. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175, the court explained that  "mandamus does not lie to enforce the performance of a duty that is discretionary, as opposed to ministerial. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Secondly, MAC is often expressly stated as an event of default which allows the lessor to call a default and potentially terminate the lease and repossess the aircraft albeit commercially these rights appear to be theoretical in the current circumstances. [read post]