Search for: "Affordable Express Corp." Results 301 - 320 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
Editor's note: This post was originally published at 7:34 p.m. on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 As the gavel comes down on the 113th Congress (which spanned January 2013 to December 2014), and the new 114th Congress begins its work today, it’s a good time to take stock of what was achieved and what lies ahead for animals in the New Year. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm by Michael Markarian
As the gavel comes down on the 113th Congress (which spanned January 2013 to December 2014) and the new 114th Congress begins its work today, it’s a good time to take stock of what was achieved and what lies ahead for animals in the New Year. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiff alleges that “in violation of their express promise to do so, and contrary to reasonable expectations,” the company and its subsidiaries “failed to take reasonable steps to maintain their customers’ personal and financial information in a secure manner. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
  The challengers insist that the language of the Affordable Care Act limits such credits to those who shop on a state-run exchange. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The Secretary had filed one prior amicus brief, in a Tenth Circuit case, expressing that interpretation. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am by Joy Waltemath
The problem was that not all the cases cited by the plaintiffs have survived the Supreme Court’s ruling in Genesis Healthcare Corp v Symczyk. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 10:52 pm by Sean Hayes
The expected push-back from industry would be that it couldn’t afford intervention by a Safety Corps. [read post]
”[27] By contrast, regulation of noncommercial or “fully protected speech” is afforded the highest constitutional protection of strict scrutiny. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Parexel Intʹl LLC, the board found that the “definitively and specifically” test was “inapposite” to the whistleblower protection provision and in “potential conflict with the express statutory authority of Sec. 1514A. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
It thus gives certainty and clarity to intermediaries, ensuing that they have a defence without question until the court makes an order and so properly protecting freedom of expression, while affording protection to claimants more effectively than the current statutory regimes. [read post]