Search for: "Alter v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 10,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:54 pm
First State Bank of Denton, 566 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1978); Marshall, 878 S.W.2d at 631; Beal Bank, SSB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 7:59 pm
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
AIRFX v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 12:23 pm
Ford. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 10:20 pm
” United States ex rel Williams v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am
Virginia and Brooke v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:30 am
Strangely, the lawsuit, State of Washington et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
In Petitioner’s view, Australia was EZL’s habitual residence, and his temporary visit to the United States did nothing to alter this fact. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
In Sandifer v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Prods. v R. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:36 am
Lee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:20 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
