Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 301 - 320
of 588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2009, 3:09 pm
Let's say that you read Gantler v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
I am, however, urging them never to position themselves against app developers in the patent policy context. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
Sullivan to Regan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
Similarly, the dispute in Am. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
Mr Justice Henry Carr in Takeda v Hoffmann-La Roche [2018] EWHC 2155 held that parties should at least have the opportunity to obtain a UK court judgment which may have some influence on a German infringement court because, by a decision of the Bundesgerichtshof, dated 15th April 2010, Xa ZB 10/09, Roll-Forming Machine, the Federal Supreme Court held that the German courts "are required to consider decisions rendered by organs of the… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
But then, I am not sure he cares. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
I am very doubtful. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
Please note: I am updating this post as comments are received, so check back for updates. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
The concept of preemption rears its head in this early case, as one of the defendant's arguments was that the State Pure Food Statute interfered with federal acts and regulations. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:08 pm
First, white women benefit significantly from state and federal affirmative-action programs (in higher education, small business loans, government contracts, etc.) and in the private sector with hiring and recent efforts to diversify boards of Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
"Harris v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:27 am
United States (1961). [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
The case especially discussed is San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
” I am returning to the issue because a U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
