Search for: "Anthony v. Harris" Results 301 - 320 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Hardwick presaged Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am by Stephen Wermiel
Brennan, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Hugo Black, William O. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
Pryor reportedly had the support of Senator Jeff Sessions, Trump’s nominee to serve as the U.S. attorney general, but a possible Pryor nomination could have drawn the ire of both the left and the right: Although Pryor has referred to the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:12 pm by Gustavo Arballo
De modo que hay muchas razones "técnicas" para explicar los vótos "tránsfugas" del republicano que votó conforme al interés demócrata y viceversa.Y una de ellas es ... la edad.El tiempo pasa, nos vamos volviendo progresEl caso de Harry Blackmun es interesante: nominado por Nixon, falló con posiciones más "liberals" (incluso redactó Roe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 55 (1963). 16 446 John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:03 am by Adam Feldman
(A good example of surprising voting coalitions that led to these fractures is Stokeling v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:03 pm by Steve Lubet
If a Republican dominated Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by Ashby Jones
” In other words, the court seems to understand the magnitude of the case — easily the most high-profile since Bush v. [read post]