Search for: "Appeal Court for Federal Circuit"
Results 301 - 320
of 60,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:31 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held that Title VII discrimination claims involving “adverse employment actions” require proof of a “cognizable injury. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:30 am
That was the year that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) began having exclusive appellate court jurisdiction over patent cases. [read post]
28 May 2024, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to issue a Rule 36 affirmance of claims as being anticipated when, according to the petition, two different venues issued inconsistent claim constructions and it isn’t clear which the CAFC has deemed correct. [read post]
28 May 2024, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to issue a Rule 36 affirmance of claims as being anticipated when, according to the petition, two different venues issued inconsistent claim constructions and it isn’t clear which the CAFC has deemed correct. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:29 am
Although the CAFC ultimately found that the McDermott Catena trust was not entitled to pursue the cancellation under § 1064, the court did find that the trust had Article III standing to appeal the TTAB’s decision in federal court. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
In a rather unconvincing opinion, a federal district court in Texas enjoined the rule’s implementation late in the Obama administration—with scant consideration of the automatic adjustment provision. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:54 am
On Friday May 24, in response to the CFPB’s motion requesting the Fifth Circuit to accelerate the issuance of its mandate from July 9, 2024 with respect to its earlier dismissal of the plaintiffs’ appeal, the Fifth Circuit ordered that the mandate be issued “forthwith. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
In order for the Texas lawyer in good standing to practice in the federal system, there must be a separate approved admission to that particular court, such as: the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
The Court of Appeals therefore sent the case back down to the district court for further proceedings. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:46 am
The CCA cited with approval a 2007 Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that said, “we don’t convict people for murder simply because they have written lyrics about murder. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:03 am
As discussed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a recent case, though, payments and transfers that may seem like double recovery often are not recoveries at all. [read post]
26 May 2024, 2:03 pm
., May 24, 2024), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Minnesota federal district court's dismissal of suits by Mayo Clinic employees who sought accommodations because their employer's Covid vaccine mandate violated their religious beliefs. [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:53 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
In the decision on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the Bureau’s funding structure was an unconstitutional “abomination” of which the “Framers warned. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
By appealing to the BIA, you ensure that you’ve taken every possible step to contest your case, which can be crucial if you later need to take your appeal to a federal circuit court. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit for review. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Thursday, May 23, affirmed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision that found a party with only a minority ownership interest in the owner of allegedly infringed marks did not have standing to seek cancellation of the marks. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Thursday, May 23, affirmed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision that found a party with only a minority ownership interest in the owner of allegedly infringed marks did not have standing to seek cancellation of the marks. [read post]
