Search for: "Application of Barrett" Results 301 - 320 of 970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This evening, while the Senate was preparing to vote on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to be the 103rd Associate Justice, the Supreme Court affirmed a stay of a district court order enjoining enforcement of Wisconsin election laws. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This evening, while the Senate was preparing to vote on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to be the 103rd Associate Justice, the Supreme Court affirmed a stay of a district court order enjoining enforcement of Wisconsin election laws. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:05 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  (Justice Barrett did not participate in the decision because she had not been present for oral argument.) [read post]
”  Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, agreed with the parties that Van Buren was entitled to obtain the information he had accessed and was authorized to retrieve information about the license plate number. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:24 am by Bill Mateja and Sarah Aberg
  Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, agreed with the parties that Van Buren was entitled to obtain the information he had accessed and was authorized to retrieve information about the license plate number. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
David Kris provided an analysis of the applications. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am by John Jascob
"Justice Barrett delivered the opinion, in which Justices Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Kavanaugh joined in full. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 5:45 pm
After the California Supreme Court's opinion in Barrett v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in the court’s decision. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:22 pm by Amy Howe
Barrett can act on the application herself or, as is more common in high-profile disputes, refer it to the full court. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 10:05 am by David Strifling
The city’s application was eventually approved, although it faces ongoing legal challenges (a 2017 story to watch). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:28 am by Marcia Coyle
Acting on three emergency applications this summer, the justices divided 6-3 twice and 5-4 once. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm by Josh Blackman
Will Justice Barrett, who just upheld this momentous social legislation turn around and say it is actually unconstitutional in most applications? [read post]