Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 301 - 320
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 4:52 pm
May 23, 2012)(slip op.) regarding asbestos-related products liability expert issues under a Frye analysis. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am
Bexis doesn’t limit his product liability horizons to drugs and devices ? [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:30 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Frederico and her husband brought suit in New Jersey Superior Court and subsequently amended the complaint to assert that Morgan Olson, LLC (“Morgan”) was liable under the doctrine of product-line successor liability because Morgan continued Grumman’s product line. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Foster Wheeler moved for summary judgment, arguing that it did not manufacture, sell, or distribute any asbestos-containing product, and that the decedent was not exposed to asbestos dust by any Foster Wheeler product. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:30 am
Chandler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:50 am
Nonetheless, ArvinMeritor did not place any warnings on its products until the early 1980's, and continued to market asbestos-containing brakes until its inventory of them was exhausted sometime in the early 1990's. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
McDonald v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
Riegel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
Riegel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
Blake writes about federal jurisdiction in an asbestos products' liability case where the exposure allegedly occurred on the Aberdeen Proving Ground. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
Blake writes about federal jurisdiction in an asbestos products' liability case where the exposure allegedly occurred on the Aberdeen Proving Ground. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Arguably, deterrence would be undermined if all manufacturers of a dangerous product eluded liability. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:17 pm
The plaintiff in the case never encountered the original asbestos containing products in the valve, he claimed that he was exposed to the "replacement" gaskets and packing used in the valve, which also contained asbestos. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:32 pm
As a southern Illinois product liability lawyer, I was interested to see a recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling in an asbestos exposure case from nearby Madison County. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:07 am
Kolyadenko v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
Simpkins v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
Simply stated, Travelers Insurance Company, who provided general liability coverage and other insurance between 1947 and 1976 to Johns Manville Corp, is no longer required to pay nearly $500 million towards asbestos settlements; specifically, the claims that center on the asbestos products manufactured by now-bankrupt Johns Manville Corp., one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos products in U.S. history. [read post]
