Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 301 - 320
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 2:08 pm
Doug Berman of Sentencing Law and Policy has this post on the California Supreme Court's application of the High Court's 2002 Atkins decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:58 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), section 921.137, Florida Statutes (2009), and Cherry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:56 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:29 pm
These are the kind of figures the Supreme Court relied on to declare the death penalty unconstitutional for the mentally retarded (Atkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm
Nine years after Brown’s trial, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:54 am
AB 5, if enacted into law, would codify the “ABC Test” for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 Dynamex v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
” Finally, well over eight years after the Supreme Court decided Atkins v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
The Court denied 8 applications for leave to appeal, and denied the motion for rehearing in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had yet to announce the constitutional rule, under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:52 am
At 10am today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
He gave two reasons for his conclusion i) It is in accordance with the true interpretation of Lord Atkin’s speech in Sim. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Tennessee 13-5086Issue: (1) Whether, in proceedings under Atkins v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:38 am
The vehicle for the Court’s review of fraud-on-the-market is Halliburton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
In Grayson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
In Grayson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to establish, through the submission of evidentiary proof in admissible form, that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the cause of action (see Suydam v O'Neill, 276 AD2d 549; Ostriker v Taylor, Atkins & Ostrow, 258 AD2d 572). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
That was already decided in Atkins v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:11 pm
One year later the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:09 am
Supreme Court’s 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
