Search for: "Auge v. Auge"
Results 301 - 320
of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2018, 6:41 pm
Counselors v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:58 am
Scoville v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Aug. 27, 2013), the Ninth Circuit construed the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
Following its victory in California, Apple's shares rose by 1.88% while Samsung's fell by 7% even in Korea where Samsung won a partial victory (see "Apple seeks to ban sale of eight Samsung phones in US" BBC 27 Aug 2012). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 10:47 am
Jane Lambert High Court, Chancery Division, Technomed Ltd and Another v Bluecrest Health Screening Ltd and Another [2017] EWHC 2142 (Ch) (24 Aug 2017) Coram David Stone sitting as a judge of the High Court This was an action for infringement of database right and copyright in an electrocardiogram ("ECG") analysis and reporting system known as ECG Cloud. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
Jane LambertChancery Division, Intellectual Property List (Mr Ian Karet) Revive A Phone Ltd v WeFix [2022] EWHC 2195 (Ch) (19 Aug 2022)This was an appeal against the decision of the hearing officer, Ms Rosie Le Breton, of 9 Sept 2021 invalidating the word mark WEFIX and the blue and white device mark that appears above. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:11 am
In MBM Financial Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:49 pm
Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meller) Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Dexcom Inc. [2021] EWHC 2246 (Pat) (6 Aug 2021)This was an application for an order to expedite the trial of an action that had been brought by Abbott Laboratories Ltd. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:31 am
Author TheBrickeninaGlory Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr David Stome) Cormeton Fire Protection Ltd v Pyrocel Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 2384 (IPEC) (26 Aug 2021)These were further proceedings in a dispute between parties that had once been closely associated but had subsequently fallen out over rights to use branding that they had [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
The Rolls Building Author Basher Eyre Licence Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 generic Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Master Clark) Massimo Osti SRL v Global Design and Innovation Ltd and another [2018] EWHC 2263 (Ch) (30 Aug 2018) This was an application by the claimant to set aside an order made by the court on its own initiative under [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:40 pm
In an Aug. 16 memorandum opinion in Bennett v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:15 pm
Aug. 20,... [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:30 pm
Zeiler v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:01 am
Barr v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:11 am
Matter of Kridel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:03 am
It discusses United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. [read post]
27 Aug 2006, 9:49 am
In Hillman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 1:57 pm
In early August, the Tennessee Court of Appeals decided a case of first impression, Torres v. [read post]
