Search for: "Austin v. Fisher*"
Results 301 - 320
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
” While Fisher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
University of Texas at Austin (No. 11-345)] and which the High Court has not addressed for 30 years. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Reilly and Sam Stein report that, in 2009, the Obama administration prepared a statement in anticipation of the Court striking down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
University of Texas at Austin (involving the University’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions) and Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm
The last major Voting Rights Act case, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
University of Texas at Austin (No. 11-345), will affect the en banc ruling. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:24 am
In judging the affirmative action program in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
In the case Fisher v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:40 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:32 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:15 pm
Bollinger in 2003, but today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:31 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:51 am
But in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
Since the 2003 SCOTUS decision, Grutter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 5:15 am
OF TX AT AUSTIN, ET AL. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:15 pm
University of Texas at Austin, concerning a public university's use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions and the Equal Protection Clause; Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:22 pm
One closely-watched case this term will be Fisher v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
University of Texas at Austin, sure to be one of the term's highlights. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:33 pm
This Essay describes a series of grave defects in Fisher v. [read post]
