Search for: "B. P."
Results 301 - 320
of 17,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
In Matter of F-P-R- , 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008) , for example, the BIA declined to follow the Second Circuit’s decision in Joaquin-Porras v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:25 am
The session will be held at 2 p,m. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
, HG.org Legal Resources, https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/i-did-not-consent-to-further-use-of-frozen-embryos-what-are-my-rights-42438#:~:text=Frozen%20embryos%20are%20considered%20property,created%20them%20have%20property%20rights. [3] Wilborn P. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:26 pm
First the Paris first instance court, then the Paris Appeal Court sided with the plaintiff, but limited the infringement to points (b) and (d) of said provision.The main issue that the Paris Appeal Court had to address was the extent to which Art. 13(1) applies to products that are not covered by a GI. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
P. 11(b). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:21 am
Una forma primaria y básica de "medir" las delegaciones es considerar el número de áreas de emergencia que involucran. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In this essay, we attempt to catalog what is known and not yet known regarding the allegations of a relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade brought forward in a motion to disqualify them. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:04 am
” 750 ILCS 5/510(b) “[P]roperty rights created by a judgment of dissolution become vested when the judgment is final, and a trial court lacks general jurisdiction to modify an order affecting these rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:28 am
Es una realidad sustentada por el artículo 75 del Estatuto Básico del Empleado Público (RDLeg. 5/2015) y su regulación complementaria. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
The Supreme Court is about to review a constitutional challenge to two unprecedented and very complicated laws regulating social media. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm
(p. 85)Dice el fallo ("p. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:44 am
The PRA identifies various benefits of its proposals, including: (a) the increased likelihood of a successful solvent exit, which should help reduce the risk of losses to firms; (b) more efficient and less costly exits; (c) reduced disruption to the wider market; (d) potential reduction of compensation payments by Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS); and (e) a more dynamic and competitive market. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:19 am
ARTICLES B. van Houtert, Het Haags Vonnissenverdrag: een game changer in Nederland? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
First, there is a structural presumption of illegality if the post-merger HHI is (a) greater than 1,800 and (b) the change in HHI is greater than 100. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:37 am
DVB-T2, ISDB-T, AVC, HEVC, VVC, Qi, Bluetooth, IEEE 8-2.11a/b/g/n, IEEE 820.16 3G, 4G, 5G, NFC. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
Consideration should be given to, among other things: “(a) asset management; (b) access controls; (c) encryption; (d) communications security; (e) physical and environmental security; [and] (f) operations security. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Today [January 24], the Commission considers a lengthy adopting release of nearly 600 pages that extensively describes numerous disclosure, dissemination, forward looking statement, liability, and accounting provisions purportedly designed to advance investor protection and facilitate capital formation for special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
" GO contested this conclusion by asserting that "[p]er se refusals based on the Informational Matter Doctrine are unconstitutional" because they "involve[] content-based discrimination that is not justified by either a compelling or substantial government interest. [read post]
