Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
As Justice Amy Coney Barrett seemingly implied during the Murthy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Going forward, I'm not sure if Justice Barrett's concurrence will have the effect that she intended. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
But , the two justices whose votes were most likely the difference—Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett—signed a concurring opinion (by Barrett) to explain their votes. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:11 pm
Justice Barrett raised some fair questions on how administrative stays should be granted. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 pm
"[S]tate officials have private lives and their own constitutional rights—including the First Amendment right to speak about their jobs and exercise editorial control over speech and speakers on their personal platforms," wrote Justice Amy Coney Barrett for a unanimous Court. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Here, Barrett cited her Doe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:28 pm
Barrett indicated that the court of appeals “presumably” can act “promptly. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:15 pm
Justice Barrett highlighted that the Fifth Circuit’s order allowing the law to go into effect was an “administrative stay” instead of a “stay pending appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:52 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett raised a hypothetical in which Louisiana state officials are doxed and targeted by threats made on social media.Read 28 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:41 am
In one example, Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed surprise when Louisiana Solicitor General J. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:34 am
Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also appeared concerned about the broad implications of the challengers’ position. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
With the liberal and conservative wings of the Court entrenched, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett likely to decide outcome of the case The post Supreme Court Hears Argument in Biden Administration Social Media Coercion Case first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Mara Elliott Says Ethics Commission Needs Greater Independence” by JW August for Times of San Diego National: “Judge Cannon Rejects Trump’s Attack on the Espionage Act” by Perry Stein and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) for MSN National: “Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media” by Mark Sherman for Associated Press News Lobbying New York: “Assembly Speaker Carl… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
[It will be harder for conservative litigants in blue states and liberal litigants in red states to obtain statewide relief. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Barrett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
I’m convinced that Justice Barrett’s concurrence in the Colorado Ballot Access case, Trump v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules public officials can be sued for blocking users on social media in some cases
16 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
However, Barrett also considered the effect of blocking a user on Facebook, which prevents them from commenting on any of a page’s posts. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Barrett, the Supreme Court created a two step test, holding that that a public official’s social media conduct only qualifies as state action under §1983 if the official: possessed actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf on the particular matter at issue, and purported to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social media posts. [read post]
