Search for: "BARTLETT v. STATE"
Results 301 - 320
of 531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The subject is preemption – specifically the the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
Bartlett. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Palmer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Bartlett, holding that state-law design-defect claims which turn on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are pre-empted by federal law. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
Bartlett, and the message is that the Justices saw this case as essentially a replay of last year’s decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Our tasty tater tot of a case for today’s consumption is Lederman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:30 pm
Bartlett that the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, preempted a state-law design-defect claim against a generic drug manufacturer. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,” United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:12 am
Bartlett. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
While we’re waiting for the Supreme Court to issue its preemption ruling in the Bartlett case (possibly as early as 10:00 a.m. today), we thought we’d examine the Court’s recent preemption decisions in non-drug/medical device cases, Hillman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
