Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 301 - 320
of 191,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
The abstract: Little remains to be said about “conscience v. access” that has not already been said — and often well said. [read post]
16 May 2007, 4:45 am
Leave not needed to continue claim Godfrey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:28 am
The Supreme Court rules in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
EOHHS and EOHHS v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 12:23 pm
Continue reading The post Securities Arbitration Lawyer v. a Non-Attorney Representative? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:24 pm
The past few months I've been watching Sackett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:57 am
Regina v Hamer [2010] WLR (D) 235 “A fixed penalty notice which had been issued to a defendant pursuant to s 2 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 was not a conviction, admission of guilt, proof that a crime had been committed, or a stain on the defendant’s character, and therefore could not be regarded as evidence which impugned the character of the defendant or admitted as such. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice… [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 8:57 pm
Noonan -- The course of litigation of Festo Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:30 am
Hila Keren It has been a while since many of us have been able to attend the gym. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
R (Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Gaines-Cooper) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 83; [2010] WLR (D) 45 “The revenue had not been shown, in considering cases founded upon asserted non-resident status, to have altered its interpretation or application of relevant guidance material. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for effecting the… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
I've been tied up, in large part with grading, but now I'm going to try to catch up on some postings I've been meaning to make over the last few weeks. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:17 pm
Lee (2017) and Broadband ITV v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
by James V. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
About three months ago, the United States Supreme Court decided Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:10 am
NHS Leeds v Larner [2012] EWCA Civ 1034; [2012] WLR (D) 227 “An employee who had been on sick leave for a prolonged period of time and who was eventually dismissed thereafter had not lost her right to the holiday pay to which she was entitled in lieu of the annual leave which she had been unable to take. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:01 am
Here: Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:53 am
For example, in FTC v. [read post]
