Search for: "Bader v. Roberts" Results 301 - 320 of 1,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 5:38 am by Katie Bart
Ironically, Totenberg pointed out, Roberts wrote the dissent from Ginsburg’s 5-4 opinion four years earlier in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Progressive, Bill Blum observes that the “Supreme Court’s 2018-19 term made it clearer than ever that Chief Justice John Roberts rules the roost behind the high tribunal’s regal red curtains,” and that, although “[h]e may be more cautious and less dogmatic than some of his brethren,” “Roberts is no liberal. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am by Rachel Brown, Preston Lim
Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin traveled to Shanghai for meetings with Vice Premier Liu He. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Roberts Jr. and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel A. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Gordon D. Todd
Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer, is the most straightforward, in that it relied principally on PG&E v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Dissent in Rucho v Common Cause Justice Elena Kagan authored a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  My own mentor, Robert McCloskey, many years ago argued that all major Supreme Court decisions were ultimately evaluated against the quite separate categories first of what Lessig calls legal “fidelity,” i.e., the persuasiveness of the strictly legal arguments that are offered; second, the institutional and political contexts within which the Court is acting and its own recognition that it is ill-advised to be either too innovative or, indeed, static in its legal… [read post]