Search for: "Balance Point Properties, LLC" Results 301 - 320 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
A few random thoughts on the cases after the jump. 1) These cases, along with last month’s Already LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, LLC, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 363382 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
Last week the court ruled on the issue in The Hebrew University of Jerusalem v General Motors LLC. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 11:35 am by Benjamin P. Keane
The bill’s ban on contributions and expenditures by covered contractors also stretches to cover any “related party” of the contractor, including associated trusts, LLCs, general partners of LLCs, and political committees. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
He points out why cloud computing could potentially be safer and provide better security than the way we conduct business now, not the opposite. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
The Morse Court reasoned that the claim would effectively "shut[] the door against inventions of other persons . . . in the properties and powers of electro-magnetism" because "it matters not by what process or machinery the result is accomplished. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Karl-Friedrich Lenz
And there are a couple of points that may make this financially attractive. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Gordon Firemark
CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW UPDATE Deadline: http://www.deadline.com/2012/07/canada-passes-major-overhaul-of-copyright-protection-law/ Canada has updated its copyright law in an effort to modernize copyright law and align Canada more closely with WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by D. Daxton White
  Such a fee structure leads to the potential for the same sorts of conflicts outlined above with brokers that leave an investor over-concentrated in the higher fee investments at the expense of a balanced portfolio. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The court decided that this was a violation of the Fourth Amendment, but was split 5-4 on whether it was a violation of property rights, or of the individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]