Search for: "Becker v. Becker" Results 301 - 320 of 843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    New York Court Finds that Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Provision Does Not Apply Extraterritorially from Epstein Becker & Green: John Fullerton III looks at  Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
On Friday, February 21, 2025, a federal judge issued a Preliminary Injunction in National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, et al. v. [read post]
Two county prosecutors, Jared Jarzynka and Christopher Becker, tried to appeal the Court of Claim’s order. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Justin F. Keith
Update: Member Schaumber issued a statement on June 22 on the Supreme Court's decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:42 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    In the Name of "Fairness," a New Jersey Federal Court Strikes the Confidentiality and Release Provisions from a Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement Agreement from Epstein Becker Green: Doug Weiner and Meg Thering look at the recent Brumley v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlOne petition for certiorari was filed last week on 4/6/22: Becker v. [read post]
 In the meantime, Epstein Becker Green has created a checklist employers can use to get and stay ahead of these issues. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Young, P.C., 121 AD3d 969, 969; see Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 734-735; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Young, P.C., 121 AD3d 969, 969 [2014]; see Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2015]; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796 [2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
In relation to Lilly’s contention that claim 1 was obvious over European Patent Application No. 0 613 007 A2 (“Becker”) published on 31 August 1994, Arnold J noted: I shall deal with this very briefly, since in my opinion it is manifest that claim 1 cannot be obvious over Becker if it is not obvious over Konig. [read post]