Search for: "Behrend, Behrend " Results 301 - 320 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Behrend (Granted )Docket: 11-864Issue(s): Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.) [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am by Travis Hinman
Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013)), and evidence with nonsensical results, such as evidence showing injuries to class members who by definition are incapable of being injured (citing In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 725 F.3d 244 (D.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am by Andrew Trask
 The subsequent re-affirmation in light of Behrend made these cases even more important. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 4:15 pm by admin
Behrend, 569 U.S. __ (2013), the Court again reversed a district court certification – heightening scrutiny on plaintiffs’ methods for alleging class wide damages. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Behrend (here), both of which dramatically changed the rules for when and how class actions may proceed. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Behrend (Granted )Docket: 11-864Issue(s): Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.) [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Behrend, 133 U.S. 1462 (2013), Judge Koh determined that the fact that damages calculations would require individualized inquiries does not defeat certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) class. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Behrend, 133 S.Ct. 1426 (2013), and the extent to which class representatives may forgo potential damages available to the class in order to achieve class certification. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. [read post]
Behrend, No. 11-864, exploded the theory that merits analysis could not be undertaken in considering class certification. [read post]