Search for: "Blackman v. Texas"
Results 301 - 320
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
To help explain that decision and to discuss its implications for future public health responses to COVID, Alan Rozenshtein spoke with law professors Lindsay Wiley of American University and Josh Blackman of the South Texas College of Law. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:44 am
Texas opinion. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:08 pm
Texas, Jonathan Adler's Business and the Roberts Court, Josh Blackman's Unprecedented and Unraveled, and Eugene Volokh, Academic Legal Writing. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:00 pm
Texas: Josh, how can the post-2017 ACA impose a mandate if the penalty is $0? [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 1:49 pm
Texas (1249-1270) United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 9:08 pm
Texas? [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
Texas.] [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
The Texas SG noted that the United States is a defendant in the ACA case (as has Josh Blackman in a previous post). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:27 pm
Texas Explain The Likely Aftermath Of a Dismissal on Standing Grounds; Finding that the state plaintiffs and the private plaintiffs lack standing will not settle the constitutionality of the ACA”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” along with a related posts titled “Reconsidering Redressability and Traceability in California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
Texas. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
University of Texas, Austin I (1076-1083) Fisher v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 12:30 am
In California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:10 pm
Texas] Today during oral argument in California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 11:46 am
NFIB v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
Texas; Some things to listen for when the Supreme Court hears oral argument in the latest Affordable Care Act case,” while Josh Blackman has a post titled “Reflecting on a Decade of ACA Litigation. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:25 am
Texas. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
As Blackman and Shapiro tell it, the individual plaintiffs in California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
Texas</em> suffer a greater Article III injury than did the individual plaintiffs in <em>NFIB v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
Now because of the rigors of Article III standing, Texas may finally turn blue. [read post]
